Approach to Managing Sex Partners of People with Sexually Transmitted Infections

References

1. • Parran T.
   Shadow on the land: syphilis.
   Reynal & Hitchcock, New York1937
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Landry D.J.
   • Forrest J.D.
   Public health departments providing sexually transmitted disease services.
   Fam Plann Perspect. 1996; 28: 261-266
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Golden M.R.
   • Hogben M.
   • Handsfield H.H.
   • et al.
   Partner notification for HIV and STD in the United States: low coverage for gonorrhea, chlamydial infection, and HIV.
   Sex Transm Dis. 2003; 30: 490-496
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Armstrong H.
   • Fernando I.
   An audit of partner notification for syphilis and HIV.
   Int J STD AIDS. 2012; 23: 825-826
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Low N.
   • Welch J.
   • Radcliffe K.
   Developing national outcome standards for the management of gonorrhoea and genital chlamydia in genitourinary medicine clinics.
   Sex Transm Infect. 2004; 80: 223-229
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Trelle S.
   • Shang A.
   • Nartey L.
   • et al.
   Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review.
   BMJ. 2007; 334: 354
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Workowski K.A.
   • Bachmann L.H.
   • Chan P.A.
   • et al.
   Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021.
   MMWR Recomm Rep (Morb Mortal Wkly Rep). 2021; 70: 1-187
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar

8. Wayal S, Estcourt CS, Mercer CH, et al. Optimising partner notification outcomes for bacterial sexually transmitted infections: a deliberative process and consensus, United Kingdom, 2019, Euro Surveill, 2022;27(3):1-6.

   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Low N.
   • Broutet N.
   • Adu-Sarkodie Y.
   • et al.
   Global control of sexually transmitted infections.
   Lancet. 2006; 368: 2001-2016
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Althaus C.L.
    • Turner K.M.
    • Mercer C.H.
    • et al.
    Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of traditional and new partner notification technologies for curable sexually transmitted infections: observational study, systematic reviews and mathematical modelling.
    Health Technol Assess. 2014; 18 (vii-viii): 1-100
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Klausner J.D.
    • Hook E.W.
    Current diagnosis & treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. McGraw Hill Professional, New York, NY2007
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Ferreira A.
    • Young T.
    • Mathews C.
    • et al.
    Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2013: Cd002843
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Nelson L.E.
    • Morrison-Beedy D.
    • Kearney M.H.
    • et al.
    Sexual partner type taxonomy use among black adolescent mothers in the United States.
    Can J Hum Sex. 2011; 20: 1-10
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Macaluso M.
    • Demand M.J.
    • Artz L.M.
    • et al.
    Partner type and condom use.
    Aids. 2000; 14: 537-546
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Estcourt C.S.
    • Flowers P.
    • Cassell J.A.
    • et al.
    Going beyond 'regular and casual': development of a classification of sexual partner types to enhance partner notification for STIs.
    Sex Transm Infect. 2022; 98: 108-114
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Yu Y.-Y.
    • Frasure-Williams J.A.
    • Dunne E.F.
    • et al.
    Chlamydia partner services for females in California family planning clinics.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2011; 38: 913-918
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Mickiewicz T.
    • Al-Tayyib A.
    • Thrun M.
    • et al.
    Implementation and effectiveness of an expedited partner therapy program in an urban clinic.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2012; 39: 923-929
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Hansman E.
    • Wynn A.
    • Moshashane N.
    • et al.
    Experiences and preferences with sexually transmitted infection care and partner notification in Gaborone, Botswana.
    Int J STD AIDS. 2021; 32: 1250-1256
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • McBride K.
    • Goldsworthy R.C.
    • Fortenberry J.D.
    Formative design and evaluation of patient-delivered partner therapy informational materials and packaging.
    Sex Transm Infect. 2009; 85: 150-155
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Ostergaard L.
    • Anderson B.
    • Moller J.K.
    • et al.
    Managing partners of people diagnosed with Chlamydia trachomatis: a comparison of two partner testing methods.
    Sex Transm Infect. 2003; 79: 358-361
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Mathews C.
    • Coetzee N.
    Partner notification.
    BMJ Clin Evid. 2009; 2009: 1-39
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Andersen B.
    • Ostergaard L.
    • Moller J.K.
    • et al.
    Home sampling versus conventional contact tracing for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male partners of infected women: randomised study.
    BMJ. 1998; 316: 350-351
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Pellowski J.
    • Mathews C.
    • Kalichman M.O.
    • et al.
    Advancing partner notification through electronic communication technology: a review of acceptability and utilization research.
    J Health Commun. 2016; 21: 629-637
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Kachur R.
    • Hall W.
    • Coor A.
    • et al.
    The use of technology for sexually transmitted disease partner services in the United States: a structured review.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2018; 45: 707-712
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Hopkins C.A.
    • Temple-Smith M.J.
    • Fairley C.K.
    • et al.
    Telling partners about chlamydia: how acceptable are the new technologies?.
    BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10: 58
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Bourne C.
    • Zablotska I.
    • Williamson A.
    • et al.
    Promotion and uptake of a new online partner notification and retesting reminder service for gay men.
    Sex Health. 2012; 9: 360-367
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Rietmeijer C.A.
    • Westergaard B.
    • Mickiewicz T.A.
    • et al.
    Evaluation of an online partner notification program.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2011; 38: 359-364
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Wilson T.E.
    • Hogben M.
    • Malka E.S.
    • et al.
    A randomized controlled trial for reducing risks for sexually transmitted infections through enhanced patient-based partner notification.
    Am J Public Health. 2009; 99: S104-S110
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Moyo W.
    • Chirenje Z.M.
    • Mandel J.S.
    • et al.
    Impact of a single session of counseling on partner referral for sexually transmitted disease treatment, Harare, Zimbabwe.
    AIDS Behav. 2004; 6: 237-243
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Faxelid E.
    • Tembo G.
    • Ndulo J.
    • et al.
    Individual counseling of patients with sexually transmitted diseases. A way to improve partner notification in a Zambian setting?.
    Sex Transm Dis. 1996; 23: 289-292
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Katz B.P.
    • Danos C.S.
    • Quinn T.S.
    • et al.
    Efficiency and cost-effectiveness of field follow-up for patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic.
    Sex Transm Dis. 1988; 15: 11-16
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Ellison G.
    • Moniez V.
    • Stein J.
    A randomized controlled trial of a standardised health message vs patient-centred counseling to improve STD partner notification.
    Ann Hum Biol. 2001; 30
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Handsfield H.H.
    • Hogben M.
    • Schillinger J.A.
    • et al.
    Expedited partner therapy in the management of sexually transmitted diseases.
    US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA2006
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Kissinger P.
    • Schmidt N.
    • Mohammed H.
    • et al.
    Patient-delivered partner treatment for Trichomonas vaginalis infection: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2006; 33: 445-450
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Schwebke J.R.
    • Desmond R.A.
    A randomized controlled trial of partner notification methods for prevention of trichomoniasis in women.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2010; 37: 392-396
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Global HIV WHO
    HaSTIP and Guidelines Review Committee, Guidelines for the management of symptomatic sexually transmitted infections. WHO Guidelines, Geneva2021
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Association A.M.
    Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 8.9 Expedited Partner Therapy.
    (Available at:)
    https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/expedited-partner-therapy
    (Accessed 2022)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Gynecologists ACoOa
    Expedited partner therapy. ACOG committee opinion No. 737.
    Obstet Gynecol, 2018
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Burstein G.R.
    • Eliscu A.
    • Ford K.
    • et al.
    Expedited partner therapy for adolescents diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhea: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
    J Adolesc Health. 2009; 45: 303-309
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Schillinger J.A.
    • Kissinger P.
    • Calvet H.
    • et al.
    Patient-delivered partner treatment with azithromycin to prevent repeated Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2003; 30: 49-56
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • Golden M.R.
    • Whittington W.L.
    • Handsfield H.H.
    • et al.
    Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection.
    N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 676-685
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Kissinger P.
    • Mohammed H.
    • Richardson-Alston G.
    • et al.
    Patient-delivered partner treatment for male urethritis: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41: 623-629
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Nuwaha F.
    • Kambugu F.
    • Nsubuga P.S.J.
    • et al.
    Efficacy of patient-delivered partner medication in the treatment of sexual partners in Uganda.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2001; 28: 105-110
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Cameron S.T.
    • Glasier A.
    • Scott G.
    • et al.
    Novel interventions to reduce re-infection in women with chlamydia: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hum Reprod. 2009; 24: 888-895
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Estcourt C.S.
    • Stirrup O.
    • Copas A.
    • et al.
    Accelerated partner therapy contact tracing for people with chlamydia (LUSTRUM): a crossover cluster-randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet Public Health. 2022; 7: e853-e865
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • Kerani R.P.
    • Fleming M.
    • DeYoung B.
    • et al.
    A randomized, controlled trial of inSPOT and patient-delivered partner therapy for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection among men who have sex with men.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2011; 38: 941-946
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Mmeje O.
    • Wallett S.
    • Kolenic G.
    • et al.
    Impact of expedited partner therapy (EPT) implementation on chlamydia incidence in the USA.
    Sex Transm Infect. 2018; 94: 545-547
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Gift T.L.
    • Kissinger P.
    • Mohammed H.
    • et al.
    The cost and cost-effectiveness of expedited partner therapy compared with standard partner referral for the treatment of chlamydia or gonorrhea.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2011; 38: 1067-1073
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Borchardt L.N.
    • Pickett M.L.
    • Tan K.T.
    • et al.
    Expedited partner therapy: pharmacist refusal of legal prescriptions.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2018; 45: 350-353
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • McCool-Myers M.
    • Goedken P.
    • Henn M.C.
    • et al.
    Who is practicing expedited partner therapy and why? Insights from providers working in specialties with high volumes of sexually transmitted infections.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2021; 48: 474-480
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
51. • Viscidi R.P.
    • Demma J.C.
    • Gu J.
    • et al.
    Comparison of sequencing of the por gene and typing of the opa gene for discrimination of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains from sexual contacts.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38: 4430-4438
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
52. • Bilek N.
    • Martin I.M.
    • Bell G.
    • et al.
    Concordance between Neisseria gonorrhoeae genotypes recovered from known sexual contacts.
    J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45: 3564-3567
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
53. • Chen H.
    • Wu Z.
    • Chen R.
    • et al.
    Typing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Opa and NG-MAST gene of 12 pairs of sexual contact gonorrhea patients in China.
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2008; 28: 472-475
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
54. • Allan-Blitz L.-T.
    • Adamson P.C.
    • Klausner J.D.
    Resistance-guided therapy for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2022; 75: 1655-1660
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
55. • Erbelding E.J.
    • Zenilman J.M.
    Toward better control of sexually transmitted diseases.
    N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 720-721
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
56. • McNulty A.
    • Teh M.F.
    • Freedman E.
    Patient delivered partner therapy for chlamydial infection: what would be missed?.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2008; 35: 834-836
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
57. • Stekler J.
    • Bachmann L.
    • Brotman R.M.
    • et al.
    Concurrent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in sex partners of patients with selected STIs: implications for patient-delivered partner therapy.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 40: 787-793
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
58. • Schillinger J.
    • Jamison K.
    • Slutsker J.
    • et al.
    P075 STI and HIV infections among MSM reporting exposure to gonorrhea or chlamydia: implications for expedited partner therapy.
    Conference Abstract. 2019; : 2019
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
59. • Gamarel K.E.
    • Mouzoon R.
    • Rivas A.
    • et al.
    Healthcare providers and community perspectives on expedited partner therapy (EPT) for use with gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men.
    Sex Transm Infect. 2020; 96: 101-105
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
60. • Braun H.M.
    • Taylor J.L.
    It’s time to expand chlamydia treatment for gay and bisexual men.
    Ann Fam Med. 2021; 19: 168-170
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
61. • Fortenberry J.D.
    • Brizendine E.J.
    • Katz B.P.
    • et al.
    The role of self-efficacy and relationship quality in partner notification by adolescents with sexually transmitted infections.
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002; 156: 1133
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
62. • Rosenthal S.L.
    • Baker J.G.
    • Biro F.M.
    • et al.
    Secondary prevention of STD transmission during adolescence: partner notification.
    Adolesc Pediatr Gynecol. 1995; 8: 183-187
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
63. • Shamash Z.
    • Catallozzi M.
    • Dayan P.S.
    • et al.
    Preferences for expedited partner therapy among adolescents in an urban pediatric emergency department: a mixed-methods study.
    Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021; 37: e91-e96
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
64. • Slutsker J.S.
    • Tsang L.B.
    • Schillinger J.A.
    Do prescriptions for expedited partner therapy for chlamydia get filled? Findings from a multi-jurisdictional evaluation, United States, 2017-2019.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2020; 47: 376-382
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
65. • Blas M.M.
    • Canchihuaman F.A.
    • Alva I.E.
    • et al.
    Pregnancy outcomes in women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis: a population-based cohort study in Washington State.
    Sex Transm Infect. 2007; 83: 314-318
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
66. • Mullick S.
    • Watson-Jones D.
    • Beksinska M.
    • et al.
    Sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy: prevalence, impact on pregnancy outcomes, and approach to treatment in developing countries.
    Sex Transm Infect. 2005; 81: 294-302
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
67. • Thurman A.R.
    • Holden A.E.C.
    • Shain R.
    • et al.
    Partner notification of sexually transmitted infections among pregnant women.
    Int J STD AIDS. 2008; 19: 309-315
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
68. • Offorjebe O.A.
    • Wynn A.
    • Moshashane N.
    • et al.
    Partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections among pregnant women in Gaborone, Botswana.
    Int J STD AIDS. 2017; 28: 1184-1189
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
69. • Silverman J.G.
    • Decker M.R.
    • Reed E.
    • et al.
    Intimate partner violence victimization prior to and during pregnancy among women residing in 26 U.S. states: associations with maternal and neonatal health.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 140-148
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
70. • Smith S.G.
    • Zhang X.
    • Basile K.C.
    • et al.
    The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2015 data brief - updated release.
    National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
71. • Rosenfeld E.A.
    • Marx J.
    • Terry M.A.
    • et al.
    Intimate partner violence, partner notification, and expedited partner therapy: a qualitative study.
    Int J STD AIDS. 2016; 27: 656-661
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
72. • KISSINGER P.J.
    • NICCOLAI L.M.
    • MAGNUS M.
    • et al.
    Partner notification for HIV and syphilis: effects on sexual behaviors and relationship stability.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2003; 30: 75-82
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
73. • Thurman A.R.
    • Shain R.N.
    • Holden A.E.C.
    • et al.
    Partner notification of sexually transmitted infections: a large cohort of Mexican American and African American women.
    Sex Transm Dis. 2008; 35: 136-140
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
74. • Klabbers R.E.
    • Muwonge T.R.
    • Ayikobua E.
    • et al.
    Understanding the role of interpersonal violence in assisted partner notification for HIV: a mixed-methods study in refugee settlements in West Nile Uganda.
    J Glob Health. 2020; 10: 020440
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
75. • Henderson R.H.
    Control of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a federal perspective.
    Br J Vener Dis. 1977; 53: 211
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
76. Duty to Warn. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    (Available at:)
    https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/duty-to-warn.htm
    (Accessed 2022)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
77. • Cina M.
    • Baumann L.
    • Egli-Gany D.
    • et al.
    Mycoplasma genitalium incidence, persistence, concordance between partners and progression: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sex Transm Infect. 2019; 95: 328-335
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
78. • Slifirski J.B.
    • Vodstrcil L.A.
    • Fairley C.K.
    • et al.
    Mycoplasma genitalium infection in adults reporting sexual contact with infected partners, Australia, 2008-2016.
    Emerg Infect Dis. 2017; 23: 1826-1833
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
79. • Plummer E.L.
    • Vodstrcil L.A.
    • Danielewski J.A.
    • et al.
    Combined oral and topical antimicrobial therapy for male partners of women with bacterial vaginosis: acceptability, tolerability and impact on the genital microbiota of couples - A pilot study.
    PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0190199
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
80. • Schwebke J.R.
    • Lensing S.Y.
    • Lee J.
    • et al.
    Treatment of male sexual partners of women with bacterial vaginosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 73: e672-e679
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar